By
referencing the Ancient Greeks, and other societies in which
pederasty existed, Wilde historically grounds himself. While the
individuals who are prosecuting him in court may not have known
explicitly what we read in Finding Out,
Wilde names iconic couples and figures, so that he literally has
years of history backing his case. Connecting with the first two
chapters of the aforementioned book, it was stated, essentially, that
as Western Europe and the United States embraced imperialism and
moved into other countries, the practice of pederasty diminished in
certain cultures. The absence of culturally-sanctioned pederasty
would have kept Europe and the US isolated from encountering this
practice, setting it up in a “us-versus-them” situation when
Western individuals were finally exposed to it. And when cultures
encounter new or different practices, they are unlikely to take to
them right away. In addition to this, the Judeo-Christian climate of
Europe would have exposed most people to the “anti-gay” verses in
the Bible, and put their minds in a moral setting which banned sodomy
or same-sex love (for the most part); Wilde confronts this in his
line about David and Jonathan. It is misunderstood because the public
believed it to be a sin, while, as Wilde puts it, it was an
intellectual relationship which was actually beneficial to both
individuals.
We can link this to the birth of the modern homosexual through the different ways that society has tried to “figure out” gay people, such as through science or socialization theories. A dominant and pervasive opinion that vilifies something that is not experienced by the majority, often crushes the voices of the oppressed group, eliminating their ability to tell their story. Thus, they become misunderstood.
Subalterns, like women, queers, racialized others, etc. are made to endure this scrutiny by dominant discourses and those who enforce them. They are mysteries that need to explain themselves ceaselessly.
ReplyDelete