Oscar Wilde contributes in
this passage to the so-called “birth of the modern homosexual” by passionately
describing the love of an older man for a younger in terms understood by the
audience of his time. He compares this love to Michelangelo, and to
Shakespeare, author of the great love story Romeo
and Juliet. In a time when sodomy was often associated with paganism and
used as a justification for colonialism, these comparisons were significant. It
is perhaps what paved the way for sexology as well; if this love and longing was
so innate and powerful that even great men like Shakespeare could find
themselves afflicted with it, then was worthy of study.
Wilde also is referring to
pederasty, love between an older and a younger man. In speaking in this sense,
his rhetoric reflects a power dynamic also present in opposite sex
relationships at the time. Because falling in love was something men should not
do, that they should go to satisfy their “urges” in brothels rather than
undermine the social system, this also portrays men as having all the agency in
the relationship. This is partially reflected in Wilde’s defense, he describes
the affection of an older man for a
younger man, making the older man the one with agency, with urges. Yet, later,
when he speaks of the intellect provided by the older man, and the joy by the
younger, he does describe it as a mutually beneficial relationship where both
parties contribute, even if those contributions are set in predetermined roles.
In doing so, he his both reproducing, and challenging, what his audience might understand
about sexual and romantic love.
No comments:
Post a Comment